Back1.com: Great Information, Real Community, Better Living.
 Register
 Login
 Main Page
 Back News
Feature Story
 Education Center
Conditions
Procedures
Diagnostics
Mary-Schatz-MD  Back
 Hero™

Mary Pullig Schatz, M.D.:
Healing Back Pain with Yoga.
About Heroes
 Join the Discussion in  Our Forums
 Community
Back1 Forums
Patient Stories
 Reference
Anatomy
Online Resources
Video Library
advertisement
Search the Body1 Network
May 18, 2012  
BACK NEWS: Feature Story

  • Printer Friendly Version
  • Email this Article
  • Links/Reprints
  • CTtechnique

    CT Technique Eliminates the Need for X-rays


    May 10, 2010

    Source: American Roentgen Ray Society

    When trauma patients receive a computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis, a technique called CT spine reformatting eliminates the need for X-rays of the thoracic and/or lumbar spine to detect spinal fractures. This technique can lower cost and overall patient radiation exposure, according to a study to be presented at the ARRS 2010 Annual Meeting in San Diego, CA.

    CT spine reformatting is performed by a CT technician after a CT scan is complete. It helps the radiologist assess the thoracic and/or lumbar regions of the spine without additional imaging, which can reduce cost and patient radiation exposure.

    “Background research shows that CT is much more sensitive and specific than X-rays in detecting thoracic and lumbar spine fractures,” said Viesha Ciura, MD, lead author of the study. Our study looked at the percentage of trauma patients who had both reformatted CT data and X-rays of the thoracic and/or lumbar region of the spine and the additional radiation dose and cost associated with the unnecessary X-rays,” said Ciura.

    The study, performed at the University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Centre, included 897 trauma CT scans with spine reformats. 19 percent of the patients with reformatted CT data showing the spine also had X-rays of the same segment of the spine. “In patients with spinal fractures detected on the CT spine reformats, the X-rays provided no additional information, and in fact, some of these fractures were not seen on the X-rays,” said Ciura. “Our calculations suggest that in every 1,000 trauma patients, the added radiation dose from spine X-rays that may not have been needed is 170 mSv; the additional cost per 1,000 trauma patients was $19,678.93,” she said.

    “At a time where radiation issues are gaining increasing importance in considering the utilization of diagnostic imaging, the addition of what appear to be unnecessary X-rays as part of managing trauma needs to be reconsidered,” said Ciura.

    “At our institution, we have introduced a new protocol, that all trauma patients undergoing CT of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis also have CT reformats of the thoracic and lumbar spine to decrease the costs and excess radiation exposure associated with additional imaging,” she said.

    Discuss in the Back1 Forums

    Last updated: 10-May-10

       
    Interact on Back1

    Discuss this topic with others.
     
    Feature Archives

    Winter Holidays Can Be Bad for the Back

    Two-thirds of spinal osteoporotic fractures remain undiagnosed and untreated

    Benefits of Alternative Approaches to Back Pain Relief

    Low Back Pain Is No Reason To Stay In Bed

    Prevention And Non-Surgical Treatment Effective For Most People Suffering From Low Back Pain

    Previous 5 Features ...

    Next 5 Features ...

    More Features ...
       
     
    Related Multimedia

    Interventional Radiologist - How they work

    Interview with Dr. Patel: What Should a Patient do to Prepare for Arthroscopic Surgery 5

    More Features ...
     
    Related Content
    CT/Cat Scan (Computerized Tomography)

    Ovarian Cysts

    Melanoma

    Advances in Spinal Cord Stimulation May Lead to More Effective Treatment for Back Pain

    More Features ...
     
    Home About Us Press Jobs Advertise With Us Contact Us
    advertisement
    ©1999- 2012 Body1 All rights reserved.
    Disclaimer: The information provided within this website is for educational purposes only and is not a substitute for consultation with your physician or healthcare provider. The opinions expressed herein are not necessarily those of the Owners and Sponsors of this site. By using this site you agree to indemnify, and hold the Owners and Sponsors harmless, from any disputes arising from content posted here-in.